NVR vs. MIDD
NVR (NVR, Inc.) and MIDD (The Middleby Corporation) are both stocks. NVR operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while MIDD operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, NVR returned 14.09%/yr vs 2.58%/yr for MIDD. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVR vs. MIDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVR achieves a -12.59% return, which is significantly lower than MIDD's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, NVR has outperformed MIDD with an annualized return of 14.09%, while MIDD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.58% annualized return.
NVR
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 11.45%
- YTD
- -12.59%
- 6M
- -15.20%
- 1Y
- -13.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
MIDD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
NVR vs. MIDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVR NVR, Inc. | -12.59% | -10.83% | 16.83% | 51.77% | -21.94% | 44.83% | 7.13% | 56.28% | -30.53% | 110.20% |
MIDD The Middleby Corporation | 6.61% | 9.76% | -7.96% | 9.91% | -31.95% | 52.62% | 17.71% | 6.61% | -23.88% | 4.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVR and MIDD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, NVR and MIDD have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
NVR:
$18.67B
MIDD:
$7.49B
NVR:
$408.34
MIDD:
-$8.36
NVR:
2.00
MIDD:
2.17
NVR:
5.34
MIDD:
3.15
NVR:
$9.66B
MIDD:
$3.67B
NVR:
$2.17B
MIDD:
$1.39B
NVR:
$1.60B
MIDD:
-$2.33M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVR vs. MIDD — Risk / Return Rank
NVR
MIDD
NVR vs. MIDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVR, Inc. (NVR) and The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVR | MIDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.09 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.40 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 0.86 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVR vs. MIDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVR drawdown since its inception was -96.72%, which is greater than MIDD's maximum drawdown of -77.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVR and MIDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVR | MIDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.72% | -77.27% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.88% | -25.63% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.94% | -35.40% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.94% | -44.38% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.13% | -69.20% | +23.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.77% | -20.61% | -15.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.19% | -24.00% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.77% | 11.84% | +3.93% |
Volatility
NVR vs. MIDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NVR, Inc. (NVR) is 7.42%, while The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that NVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVR | MIDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 8.28% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.17% | 24.84% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.34% | 38.91% | -11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 33.77% | -6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 36.80% | -4.83% |
Dividends
NVR vs. MIDD - Dividend Comparison
Neither NVR nor MIDD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NVR vs. MIDD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVR, Inc. and The Middleby Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NVR vs. MIDD - Profitability Comparison
NVR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 360.34M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.6%.
MIDD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported a gross profit of 323.19M and revenue of 839.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
NVR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.37M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
MIDD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported an operating income of 134.89M and revenue of 839.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
NVR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a net income of 198.36M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
MIDD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Middleby Corporation reported a net income of -50.07M and revenue of 839.91M, resulting in a net margin of -6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NVR and MIDD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MIDD has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to NVR (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVR dropped -96.72% vs MIDD's -77.27%.
MIDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVR and MIDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer