NVO vs. XLE
NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) is a stock, while XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, NVO returned 8.66%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for XLE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVO vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVO achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NVO has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 8.66%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.
NVO
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- 6M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- -19.63%
- 3Y*
- -11.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
XLE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 36.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
NVO vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.72% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 52.92% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.29% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVO and XLE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.20 |
The correlation between NVO and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVO vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
NVO
XLE
NVO vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.29 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 2.45 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 6.58 | -7.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVO vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVO drawdown since its inception was -74.70%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVO and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.70% | -71.26% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.17% | -14.98% | -34.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.70% | -20.14% | -54.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.70% | -26.04% | -48.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.70% | -66.81% | -7.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.59% | -8.20% | -54.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -17.95% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.66% | 5.57% | +26.09% |
Volatility
NVO vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 6.10%. This indicates that NVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 6.10% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.48% | 16.65% | +20.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.71% | 20.96% | +30.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.56% | 25.87% | +12.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.61% | 29.58% | +3.03% |
Dividends
NVO vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than XLE's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 3.50% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.66% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVO and XLE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVO has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to XLE (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVO dropped -74.70% vs XLE's -71.26%.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVO and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer