PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVLIX vs. TTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVLIX vs. TTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVLIX achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than TTIHX's 12.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NVLIX has outperformed TTIHX with an annualized return of 17.78%, while TTIHX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.25% annualized return.


NVLIX

1D
0.20%
1M
8.83%
YTD
9.51%
6M
8.70%
1Y
21.64%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
17.78%

TTIHX

1D
0.36%
1M
5.46%
YTD
12.23%
6M
12.98%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVLIX vs. TTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVLIX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I
9.51%12.76%29.48%43.60%-31.31%27.62%37.97%33.54%3.02%33.09%
TTIHX
Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I
12.23%20.97%15.27%20.62%-17.68%17.31%17.11%26.16%-7.15%19.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NVLIX and TTIHX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2015

0.87

The correlation between NVLIX and TTIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVLIX vs. TTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVLIX
NVLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NVLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NVLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

TTIHX
TTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVLIX vs. TTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVLIXTTIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

2.48

-1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

3.44

-1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

3.22

-2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.67

14.34

-10.68

NVLIX vs. TTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the TTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVLIX and TTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVLIXTTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.48

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.73

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.78

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.75

+0.06

Drawdowns

NVLIX vs. TTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than TTIHX's maximum drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVLIX and TTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVLIXTTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-31.83%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.01%

-8.91%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

-15.14%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-25.56%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.57%

-31.83%

-7.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-4.48%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

1.99%

+4.14%

Volatility

NVLIX vs. TTIHX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX) at 3.42%. This indicates that NVLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVLIXTTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

3.42%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

9.18%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

11.54%

+4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.36%

14.65%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.04%

15.73%

+6.31%

NVLIX vs. TTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVLIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TTIHX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVLIX vs. TTIHX - Dividend Comparison

NVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.50%, more than TTIHX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVLIX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I
20.50%22.45%14.35%5.39%8.93%9.51%5.47%8.69%18.81%18.70%17.11%15.18%
TTIHX
Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I
2.49%2.79%2.10%2.06%2.21%1.95%1.62%2.16%2.59%0.11%2.35%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVLIX and TTIHX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVLIX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to TTIHX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVLIX dropped -39.57% vs TTIHX's -31.83%.

TTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVLIX and TTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer