NVLIX vs. FLAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX).
NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009. FLAAX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Oct 2, 1988.
Performance
NVLIX vs. FLAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NVLIX vs. FLAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -11.60% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
FLAAX Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund | -0.24% | 2.78% | 2.58% | 6.52% | -16.29% | 3.89% | 5.64% | 9.03% | 0.50% | 8.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVLIX achieves a -11.60% return, which is significantly lower than FLAAX's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NVLIX has outperformed FLAAX with an annualized return of 15.48%, while FLAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.
NVLIX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -11.60%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
FLAAX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- -0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NVLIX vs. FLAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVLIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAAX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NVLIX vs. FLAAX — Risk / Return Rank
NVLIX
FLAAX
NVLIX vs. FLAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVLIX | FLAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 0.80 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.16 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.74 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 2.12 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVLIX | FLAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | -0.12 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.39 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.92 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between NVLIX and FLAAX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NVLIX vs. FLAAX - Dividend Comparison
NVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.40%, more than FLAAX's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 25.40% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
FLAAX Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund | 4.30% | 4.21% | 3.85% | 3.55% | 3.39% | 2.83% | 3.07% | 3.69% | 3.72% | 3.65% | 3.79% | 3.84% |
Drawdowns
NVLIX vs. FLAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than FLAAX's maximum drawdown of -21.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVLIX and FLAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVLIX | FLAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -21.01% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.01% | -4.96% | -14.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -21.01% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.57% | -21.01% | -18.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.03% | -6.59% | -9.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -2.73% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 1.74% | +4.06% |
Volatility
NVLIX vs. FLAAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) at 1.36%. This indicates that NVLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NVLIX | FLAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 1.36% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 1.92% | +10.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 5.01% | +17.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 4.52% | +17.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 4.65% | +17.34% |