PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAAX vs. FMNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAAX vs. FMNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAAX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than FMNDX's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FLAAX has outperformed FMNDX with an annualized return of 1.78%, while FMNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.


FLAAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.57%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.78%

FMNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.38%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAAX vs. FMNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
1.11%2.78%2.58%6.52%-16.29%3.89%5.64%9.03%0.50%8.03%
FMNDX
Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.01%3.31%3.04%3.37%-0.09%0.03%0.86%2.00%1.58%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAAX and FMNDX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.36

The correlation between FLAAX and FMNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAAX vs. FMNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAAX
FLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FMNDX
FMNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FMNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAAX vs. FMNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAAXFMNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

3.17

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

8.51

-5.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

3.45

-2.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

10.81

-8.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.40

45.05

-39.65

FLAAX vs. FMNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the FMNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAAX and FMNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAAXFMNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

3.17

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

1.99

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

1.78

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.70

-0.78

Drawdowns

FLAAX vs. FMNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAAX drawdown since its inception was -21.01%, which is greater than FMNDX's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAAX and FMNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAAXFMNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.01%

-1.69%

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-0.30%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-1.09%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-1.09%

-19.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.01%

-1.69%

-19.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

0.00%

-5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-0.10%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.07%

+0.97%

Volatility

FLAAX vs. FMNDX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) at 0.27%. This indicates that FLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAAXFMNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.27%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

0.67%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

0.94%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

1.06%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

0.91%

+3.75%

FLAAX vs. FMNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FMNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLAAX vs. FMNDX - Dividend Comparison

FLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than FMNDX's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
3.89%4.21%3.85%3.55%3.39%2.83%3.07%3.69%3.72%3.65%3.79%3.84%
FMNDX
Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
2.82%2.95%2.99%2.60%0.61%0.23%0.85%1.58%1.46%1.00%0.75%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAAX and FMNDX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAAX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to FMNDX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAAX dropped -21.01% vs FMNDX's -1.69%.

FMNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAAX and FMNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer