NVIT vs. OMAH
NVIT (YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NVIT charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
NVIT vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVIT achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.
NVIT
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 6.72%
- YTD
- 15.44%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVIT vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVIT YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 15.44% | 3.48% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVIT and OMAH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVIT vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
NVIT
OMAH
NVIT vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVIT | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 0.70 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
NVIT vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVIT drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIT and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVIT | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -11.83% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -2.65% | -4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -1.26% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility
NVIT vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVIT | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.08% | 8.05% | +21.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.08% | 13.21% | +15.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.08% | 13.21% | +15.87% |
NVIT vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVIT has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVIT vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
NVIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.36%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVIT YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 12.36% | 2.37% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVIT and OMAH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for NVIT.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 12.36% for NVIT.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for NVIT and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for NVIT and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer