PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVII vs. PLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVII vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVII achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -31.68% return.


NVII

1D
-1.83%
1M
1.41%
6M
11.95%
YTD
13.29%
1Y
29.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTW

1D
0.42%
1M
0.62%
6M
-31.01%
YTD
-31.68%
1Y
-20.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVII vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVII
REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF
13.29%47.63%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-31.68%47.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NVII and PLTW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVII vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVII vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVIIPLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.99

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

-0.36

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.46

-0.69

+4.15

NVII vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVII Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVII and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVII vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVII drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVII and PLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVIIPLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.56%

-57.27%

+38.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.56%

-57.27%

+38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.29%

-44.12%

+33.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-24.49%

+18.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.51%

29.84%

-21.33%

Volatility

NVII vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) is 10.42%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 18.73%. This indicates that NVII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVIIPLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

18.73%

-8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.93%

48.03%

-20.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.25%

61.70%

-25.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.52%

73.81%

-38.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.52%

73.81%

-38.29%

NVII vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVII and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

NVII vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.68%, less than PLTW's 126.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025
NVII
REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF
55.68%29.17%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
126.22%72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVII and PLTW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (18.73%) compared to NVII (10.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVII dropped -18.56% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 29.35% vs -20.56% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NVII has been the lower-risk option at 10.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 29.35% return vs -20.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVII and PLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 126.22%, compared with 55.68% for NVII.

They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill.

NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVII and PLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer