NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO
NVHE.TO (Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVHE.TO achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 38.88% return.
NVHE.TO
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 14.71%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 22.93%
- 1Y
- 66.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNQE.TO
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 38.88%
- 6M
- 34.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVHE.TO Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 21.88% | 9.02% |
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 38.88% | 13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVHE.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NVHE.TO
CNQE.TO
NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVHE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVHE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 2.45 | -1.68 |
Drawdowns
NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.87%, which is greater than CNQE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVHE.TO and CNQE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVHE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.87% | -18.22% | -22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -6.40% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -4.14% | -5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.70% | — | — |
Volatility
NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVHE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.81% | 33.04% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.08% | 33.04% | +16.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.08% | 33.04% | +16.04% |
NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NVHE.TO and CNQE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
NVHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison
NVHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.71%, more than CNQE.TO's 9.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 9.43% | 4.42% | 0.00% |
NVHE.TO Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 20.71% | 21.62% | 7.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVHE.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVHE.TO and CNQE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
Find the right allocation for NVHE.TO and CNQE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer