NVGS vs. CBOE
NVGS (Navigator Holdings Ltd.) and CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) are both stocks. NVGS operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while CBOE operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, NVGS returned 9.14%/yr vs 17.33%/yr for CBOE. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NVGS vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVGS achieves a 26.72% return, which is significantly higher than CBOE's 19.20% return. Over the past 10 years, NVGS has underperformed CBOE with an annualized return of 9.14%, while CBOE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.33% annualized return.
NVGS
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 19.68%
- YTD
- 26.72%
- 1Y
- 42.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 18.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.34%
CBOE
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- 19.62%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- 20.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $339.81M | $330.40M | $425.43M | |
| $8.80M | $8.84M | $10.18M |
NVGS vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVGS Navigator Holdings Ltd. | 26.72% | 14.44% | 6.79% | 22.52% | 34.84% | -19.00% | -18.71% | 43.30% | -4.57% | 5.91% |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 19.20% | 29.96% | 10.74% | 44.37% | -2.16% | 42.23% | -21.17% | 24.16% | -20.60% | 70.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVGS and CBOE is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2010 | 0.09 |
The correlation between NVGS and CBOE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (3 years) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NVGS:
$1.35B
CBOE:
$31.17B
NVGS:
$1.64
CBOE:
$12.89
NVGS:
13.27
CBOE:
23.10
NVGS:
0.01
CBOE:
0.43
NVGS:
2.50
CBOE:
6.18
NVGS:
1.20
CBOE:
5.55
NVGS:
$576.17M
CBOE:
$5.06B
NVGS:
$206.98M
CBOE:
$2.65B
NVGS:
$287.24M
CBOE:
$2.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVGS vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank
NVGS
CBOE
NVGS vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVGS | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.59 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 1.90 | +4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVGS vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVGS drawdown since its inception was -87.68%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVGS and CBOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVGS | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.68% | -43.23% | -44.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.12% | -36.73% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.88% | -36.73% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.88% | -36.73% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.33% | -43.23% | -30.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.95% | -18.61% | -9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.91% | -11.53% | -32.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.07% | 11.33% | -4.26% |
Volatility
NVGS vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) is 9.03%, while Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a volatility of 11.43%. This indicates that NVGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVGS | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 11.43% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.71% | 29.54% | -4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.11% | 32.15% | -3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.66% | 24.28% | +11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.59% | 25.93% | +21.66% |
Dividends
NVGS vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison
NVGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than CBOE's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 0.97% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.83% | 1.30% | 1.36% |
NVGS Navigator Holdings Ltd. | 1.19% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NVGS vs. CBOE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Navigator Holdings Ltd. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NVGS vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison
NVGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 41.66M and revenue of 140.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.6%.
CBOE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 731.60M and revenue of 1.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.
NVGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 31.41M and revenue of 140.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.
CBOE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 476.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
NVGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 35.46M and revenue of 140.62M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
CBOE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 353.10M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NVGS and CBOE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBOE has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to NVGS (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVGS dropped -87.68% vs CBOE's -43.23%.
NVGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVGS and CBOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer