NVDY vs. VT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. NVDY is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDY returned 51.33%/yr vs 19.71%/yr for VT. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

NVDY vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDY achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.06% return.

NVDY

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -7.09%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 6M: 14.71%
• 1Y: 36.80%
• 3Y*: 51.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 11.82%
• 1Y: 25.83%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 12.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDY vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	8.91%	27.38%	114.23%	41.31%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.06%	22.43%	16.49%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDY and VT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.56

The correlation between NVDY and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVDY vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDY

NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 47
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 47

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 68
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDY vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDY	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.94	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	2.67	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.35	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.68	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	11.67	-4.88

NVDY vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDY and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDY vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDY drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDY and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDY	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.08%	-50.27%	+16.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-9.67%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.08%	-16.51%	-17.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.09%	-1.92%	-8.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-7.01%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.44%	2.22%	+3.22%

Volatility

NVDY vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.26%. This indicates that NVDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDY	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.45%	5.26%	+5.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.66%	11.01%	+10.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.06%	13.38%	+14.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.24%	16.15%	+22.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.24%	17.27%	+20.97%

NVDY vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDY vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.87%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	66.87%	83.10%	83.65%	22.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.61%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDY and VT in my portfolio?

NVDY and VT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDY or VT?

NVDY has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDY dropped -34.08% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, NVDY or VT?

On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 51.33% vs 19.71% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDY or VT?

Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 51.33% return vs 19.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDY or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDY or VT?

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 66.87%, compared with 1.61% for VT.

What is the main difference between NVDY and VT?

NVDY is categorized as Derivative Income, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVDY and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.