NVDX vs. QTAP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDX returned -0.09% vs 20.30% for QTAP. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NVDX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

NVDX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.57% return.

NVDX

• 1D: 5.58%
• 1M: 3.93%
• 6M: -5.82%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 1Y: -0.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 107.47%

QTAP

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 12.76%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	$104.20M	$115.30M	$173.21M
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	$235.81K	$225.86K	$220.48K

NVDX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-2.69%	26.24%	384.03%	28.06%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	13.57%	19.36%	17.34%	6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDX and QTAP is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	0.62

The correlation between NVDX and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

NVDX vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVDX	QTAP
Technology	100.0%	50.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.7%
Energy	-	0.7%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Industrials	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

NVDX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDX

NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 12
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDX	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	2.95	-3.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	4.74	-4.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.69	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	6.93	-7.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	33.23	-33.45

NVDX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDX and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDX	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.19%	-29.44%	-38.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.76%	-2.81%	-40.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.22%	-1.05%	-31.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.74%	-4.91%	-15.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.46%	0.59%	+21.87%

Volatility

NVDX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a higher volatility of 24.18% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.75%. This indicates that NVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDX	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.18%	2.75%	+21.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.63%	5.69%	+50.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.80%	6.61%	+66.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.85%	18.92%	+75.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.85%	18.57%	+76.28%

NVDX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	3.44%	3.35%	15.48%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDX and QTAP in my portfolio?

NVDX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDX or QTAP?

NVDX has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to QTAP (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDX dropped -68.19% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, NVDX or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 20.30% vs -0.09% for NVDX. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDX or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 20.30% return vs -0.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDX or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDX or QTAP?

NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between NVDX and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDX and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.