PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDX vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDX vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 837.72% return.


NVDX

1D
-1.74%
1M
-8.51%
YTD
8.64%
6M
11.25%
1Y
58.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-14.47%
1M
56.79%
YTD
837.72%
6M
769.43%
1Y
343.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDX vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVDX and ARMG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.47

The correlation between NVDX and ARMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDX vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDX vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDXARMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

5.08

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

8.87

-5.96

NVDX vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDX and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDX vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDXARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.19%

-80.28%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.76%

-68.13%

+24.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.33%

-14.47%

-9.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.33%

-51.83%

+31.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.99%

38.95%

-18.96%

Volatility

NVDX vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) is 25.45%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 71.63%. This indicates that NVDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDXARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.45%

71.63%

-46.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.08%

114.78%

-61.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.57%

140.12%

-69.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.43%

142.88%

-47.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.43%

142.88%

-47.45%

NVDX vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDX vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than ARMG's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
0.52%4.86%0.00%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
3.08%3.35%15.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDX and ARMG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARMG has higher volatility (71.63%) compared to NVDX (25.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDX dropped -68.19% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 343.67% vs 58.04% for NVDX. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NVDX has been the lower-risk option at 25.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 343.67% return vs 58.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.

NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.52% for ARMG.

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDX and 0.75% for ARMG.

ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDX and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer