NVDW vs. XPAY
NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) and XPAY (Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDW returned 56.88% vs 27.22% for XPAY. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XPAY.
Performance
NVDW vs. XPAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than XPAY's 10.83% return.
NVDW
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 56.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPAY
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW vs. XPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 15.96% | 40.00% |
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF | 10.83% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDW and XPAY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between NVDW and XPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDW vs. XPAY — Risk / Return Rank
NVDW
XPAY
NVDW vs. XPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDW | XPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.93 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 13.50 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDW | XPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.31 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 1.21 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
NVDW vs. XPAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than XPAY's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and XPAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDW | XPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -18.20% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -9.34% | -16.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.65% | -0.68% | -9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -2.37% | -5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.49% | 2.02% | +8.47% |
Volatility
NVDW vs. XPAY - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) at 2.76%. This indicates that NVDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDW | XPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.04% | 2.76% | +12.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.74% | 8.82% | +21.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.15% | 11.82% | +29.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.15% | 16.70% | +24.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.15% | 16.70% | +24.45% |
NVDW vs. XPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XPAY's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDW vs. XPAY - Dividend Comparison
NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.16%, more than XPAY's 20.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 58.16% | 38.94% | 0.00% |
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF | 20.37% | 21.21% | 3.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDW and XPAY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDW has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to XPAY (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs XPAY's -18.20%.
On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 56.88% vs 27.22% for XPAY. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 56.88% return vs 27.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 58.16%, compared with 20.37% for XPAY.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVDW and 0.49% for XPAY.
XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDW and XPAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer