NVDW vs. QDTY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) and QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDW returned 51.10% vs 33.68% for QDTY. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for QDTY.

Performance

NVDW vs. QDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVDW having a 12.02% return and QDTY slightly higher at 12.10%.

NVDW

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -3.62%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 51.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTY

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 6M: 11.87%
• 1Y: 33.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDW vs. QDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	12.02%	40.00%
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	12.10%	21.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and QDTY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.59

The correlation between NVDW and QDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVDW vs. QDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW

NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 38
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 36
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 34

QDTY

QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 68
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDW vs. QDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDW	QDTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.12	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.71	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.38	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	3.05	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.84	11.07	-6.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDW vs. QDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the QDTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDW and QDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDW	QDTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.12	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	0.71	+0.64

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. QDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than QDTY's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and QDTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDW	QDTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.54%	-23.45%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.54%	-11.10%	-14.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.69%	-3.67%	-10.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-4.47%	-3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.59%	3.05%	+7.54%

Volatility

NVDW vs. QDTY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) at 6.26%. This indicates that NVDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDW	QDTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.23%	6.26%	+8.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.58%	12.86%	+18.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.74%	16.00%	+25.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.59%	26.13%	+15.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.59%	26.13%	+15.46%

NVDW vs. QDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDW vs. QDTY - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.31%, more than QDTY's 31.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	61.31%	38.94%
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	31.52%	26.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDW and QDTY in my portfolio?

NVDW and QDTY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDW or QDTY?

NVDW has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to QDTY (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs QDTY's -23.45%.

Which ETF is better, NVDW or QDTY?

On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 51.10% vs 33.68% for QDTY. On fees, NVDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDW or QDTY?

Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 51.10% return vs 33.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDW or QDTY?

NVDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDW or QDTY?

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.31%, compared with 31.52% for QDTY.

What is the main difference between NVDW and QDTY?

NVDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while QDTY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVDW and 1.01% for QDTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.