NVDW vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDW returned 56.88% vs 11.44% for OMAH. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NVDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

NVDW vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.

NVDW

• 1D: -4.20%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 6M: 20.80%
• 1Y: 56.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDW vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	15.96%	40.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.56%	6.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and OMAH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	-0.02

Return for Risk

NVDW vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW

NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 38
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 35
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 35

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDW vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDW	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.43	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.02	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	3.82	-1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	9.48	-4.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDW vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDW and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDW	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	1.43	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	0.70	+0.82

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDW	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.54%	-11.83%	-13.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.54%	-3.00%	-22.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.65%	-2.65%	-8.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-1.26%	-6.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.49%	1.21%	+9.28%

Volatility

NVDW vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that NVDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDW	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.04%	1.93%	+13.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.74%	5.49%	+25.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.15%	8.05%	+33.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.15%	13.21%	+27.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.15%	13.21%	+27.94%

NVDW vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDW vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.16%, more than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	58.16%	38.94%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDW and OMAH in my portfolio?

NVDW and OMAH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDW or OMAH?

NVDW has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, NVDW or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 56.88% vs 11.44% for OMAH. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDW or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 56.88% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDW or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDW or OMAH?

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 58.16%, compared with 15.44% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between NVDW and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVDW and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.