NVDW vs. AAPW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) and AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDW returned 56.88% vs 59.54% for AAPW. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

NVDW vs. AAPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NVDW having a 15.96% return and AAPW slightly lower at 15.21%.

NVDW

• 1D: -4.20%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 6M: 20.80%
• 1Y: 56.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPW

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 14.30%
• YTD: 15.21%
• 6M: 9.47%
• 1Y: 59.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDW vs. AAPW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	15.96%	40.00%
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	15.21%	39.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and AAPW is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

NVDW vs. AAPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW

NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 38
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 35
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 35

AAPW

AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 62
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDW vs. AAPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDW	AAPW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.17	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	3.01	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.38	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	3.45	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	8.65	-3.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDW vs. AAPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the AAPW Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDW and AAPW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDW	AAPW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	2.17	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	0.55	+0.97

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. AAPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum AAPW drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and AAPW.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDW	AAPW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.54%	-36.28%	+10.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.54%	-17.36%	-8.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.65%	-1.85%	-8.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-11.18%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.49%	6.91%	+3.58%

Volatility

NVDW vs. AAPW - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) at 6.61%. This indicates that NVDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDW	AAPW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.04%	6.61%	+8.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.74%	19.54%	+11.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.15%	27.56%	+13.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.15%	34.72%	+6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.15%	34.72%	+6.43%

NVDW vs. AAPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDW and AAPW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

NVDW vs. AAPW - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.16%, more than AAPW's 31.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	31.37%	28.83%
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	58.16%	38.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDW and AAPW in my portfolio?

NVDW and AAPW have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDW or AAPW?

NVDW has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to AAPW (6.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs AAPW's -36.28%.

Which ETF is better, NVDW or AAPW?

On 1-year performance, AAPW leads with 59.54% vs 56.88% for NVDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPW has been the lower-risk option at 6.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDW or AAPW?

Over the 1-year period, AAPW has performed better with a 59.54% return vs 56.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDW or AAPW?

NVDW and AAPW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDW or AAPW?

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 58.16%, compared with 31.37% for AAPW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.