NVDU vs. TNA
NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. NVDU is actively managed, while TNA is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDU returned 84.73% vs 118.36% for TNA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDU charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNA.
Performance
NVDU vs. TNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDU achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 46.53% return.
NVDU
- 1D
- -7.30%
- 1M
- 14.13%
- YTD
- 19.93%
- 6M
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNA
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 46.53%
- 6M
- 40.42%
- 1Y
- 118.36%
- 3Y*
- 28.02%
- 5Y*
- -6.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
NVDU vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 19.93% | 33.65% | 289.29% | 9.96% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 46.53% | 9.82% | 7.21% | 24.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDU and TNA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.35 |
NVDU vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVDU
TNA
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
NVDU
TNA
Basic Materials
NVDU
-
TNA
Communication Services
NVDU
-
TNA
Consumer Cyclical
NVDU
-
TNA
Consumer Defensive
NVDU
-
TNA
Energy
NVDU
-
TNA
Financial Services
NVDU
-
TNA
Healthcare
NVDU
-
TNA
Industrials
NVDU
-
TNA
Real Estate
NVDU
-
TNA
Utilities
NVDU
-
TNA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDU vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank
NVDU
TNA
NVDU vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDU | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 2.09 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 2.57 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.66 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 12.05 | -7.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDU | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 2.09 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.23 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
NVDU vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDU drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDU and TNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDU | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -88.09% | +20.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.27% | -32.53% | -9.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -65.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.32% | -38.03% | +19.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -33.90% | +15.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.47% | 9.86% | +8.61% |
Volatility
NVDU vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a higher volatility of 24.74% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) at 17.14%. This indicates that NVDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDU | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.74% | 17.14% | +7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.50% | 40.25% | +10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.02% | 57.08% | +10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.06% | 67.31% | +23.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.06% | 68.42% | +22.64% |
NVDU vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDU vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison
NVDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than TNA's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 4.83% | 5.68% | 16.85% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDU and TNA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDU has higher volatility (24.74%) compared to TNA (17.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDU dropped -67.27% vs TNA's -88.09%.
On 1-year performance, TNA leads with 118.36% vs 84.73% for NVDU. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 17.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TNA has performed better with a 118.36% return vs 84.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.
NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.41% for TNA.
Their fees differ too: 1.04% for NVDU and 1.14% for TNA.
TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDU and TNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer