NVDU vs. BTCI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDU returned 43.69% vs -39.17% for BTCI. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDU charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.

Performance

NVDU vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDU achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -29.23% return.

NVDU

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -16.54%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 43.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCI

• 1D: -4.12%
• 1M: -20.56%
• YTD: -29.23%
• 6M: -29.02%
• 1Y: -39.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDU vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	1.48%	33.65%	-7.13%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-29.23%	-1.09%	26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDU and BTCI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

NVDU vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDU

NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 22
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 23
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDU vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDU	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	-0.99	+1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	-1.40	+2.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.84	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	-0.82	+1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	-1.44	+3.70

NVDU vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDU and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDU vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDU drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than BTCI's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDU and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDU	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.27%	-47.67%	-19.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.27%	-47.67%	+5.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.88%	-47.67%	+16.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.93%	-16.13%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.40%	27.17%	-7.77%

Volatility

NVDU vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a higher volatility of 25.98% compared to NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) at 13.01%. This indicates that NVDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDU	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.98%	13.01%	+12.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.66%	31.43%	+21.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.44%	39.93%	+30.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.95%	40.41%	+50.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.95%	40.41%	+50.54%

NVDU vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDU vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

NVDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, less than BTCI's 50.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	50.52%	36.46%	6.76%	0.00%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	5.82%	5.68%	16.85%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDU and BTCI in my portfolio?

NVDU and BTCI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDU or BTCI?

NVDU has higher volatility (25.98%) compared to BTCI (13.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDU dropped -67.27% vs BTCI's -47.67%.

Which ETF is better, NVDU or BTCI?

On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 43.69% vs -39.17% for BTCI. On fees, BTCI is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 13.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDU or BTCI?

Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 43.69% return vs -39.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDU or BTCI?

BTCI is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for NVDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDU or BTCI?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 50.52%, compared with 5.82% for NVDU.

What is the main difference between NVDU and BTCI?

NVDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for NVDU and 0.99% for BTCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.