NVDS vs. SH
Compare and contrast key facts about Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH).
NVDS and SH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NVDS is a passively managed fund by AXS that tracks the performance of the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%). It was launched on Jul 13, 2022. SH is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 (-100%). It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. Both NVDS and SH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NVDS vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NVDS vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 5.72% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -14.84% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 5.77% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | -1.61% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVDS having a 5.72% return and SH slightly higher at 5.77%.
NVDS
- 1D
- -8.30%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- -61.69%
- 3Y*
- -66.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- -11.46%
- 3Y*
- -9.86%
- 5Y*
- -7.57%
- 10Y*
- -11.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NVDS vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
SH
NVDS vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDS | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | -0.63 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | -0.79 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.89 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.45 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | -0.55 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDS | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | -0.63 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.00 | -0.56 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and SH is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NVDS vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.42%, more than SH's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 13.42% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 3.92% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.20%, which is greater than SH's maximum drawdown of -94.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and SH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.20% | -94.26% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.78% | -26.61% | -47.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.03% | -93.82% | -5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.65% | -67.49% | -15.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.48% | 21.81% | +40.67% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 5.30%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.74% | 5.30% | +10.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.94% | 9.43% | +29.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.44% | 18.17% | +43.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.41% | 16.87% | +52.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.41% | 17.99% | +51.42% |