NVDS vs. EMTY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - NVDS tracks the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%) while EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDS returned -65.20%/yr vs -4.59%/yr for EMTY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.

Performance

NVDS vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -29.31% return, which is significantly lower than EMTY's 1.41% return.

NVDS

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -17.63%
• YTD: -29.31%
• 6M: -32.74%
• 1Y: -58.02%
• 3Y*: -65.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMTY

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: 0.17%
• 3Y*: -4.59%
• 5Y*: -2.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDS vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	-29.31%	-58.18%	-80.03%	-83.15%	-14.84%
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	1.41%	-1.76%	-4.13%	0.27%	-9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDS and EMTY is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022	0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between NVDS and EMTY has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NVDS vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDS

NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

EMTY

EMTY Risk / Return Rank: 9
EMTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
EMTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
EMTY Omega Ratio Rank: 9
EMTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
EMTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDS vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDS	EMTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.14	0.01	-1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.91	0.13	-2.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.02	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	0.01	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	0.01	-1.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDS vs. EMTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDS Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the EMTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDS and EMTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDS	EMTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.14	0.01	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.03	-0.43	-0.60

Drawdowns

NVDS vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and EMTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDS	EMTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-77.62%	-21.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.88%	-14.00%	-45.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.32%	-30.83%	-65.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.35%	-74.69%	-24.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.38%	-54.00%	-29.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.60%	8.11%	+30.49%

Volatility

NVDS vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) at 6.31%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDS	EMTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.32%	6.31%	+12.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.28%	12.39%	+25.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.88%	17.71%	+33.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.85%	22.37%	+46.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.85%	25.68%	+43.17%

NVDS vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDS vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison

NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.07%, more than EMTY's 3.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	3.44%	3.83%	6.00%	4.41%	0.65%	0.00%	0.07%	0.82%	0.62%	0.03%
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	20.07%	14.19%	14.11%	14.69%	5.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDS and EMTY in my portfolio?

NVDS and EMTY have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDS or EMTY?

NVDS has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to EMTY (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs EMTY's -77.62%.

Which ETF is better, NVDS or EMTY?

On 3-year performance, EMTY leads with -4.59% vs -65.20% for NVDS. On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, EMTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDS or EMTY?

Over the 3-year period, EMTY has performed better with a -4.59% return vs -65.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDS or EMTY?

EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDS or EMTY?

NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 20.07%, compared with 3.44% for EMTY.

What is the main difference between NVDS and EMTY?

NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: AXS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 0.66% for EMTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.