PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDS vs. DOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVDS vs. DOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVDS vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
5.72%-58.18%-80.03%-83.15%-14.84%
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
4.40%-8.40%-5.62%-7.05%-8.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than DOG's 4.40% return.


NVDS

1D
-8.30%
1M
0.93%
YTD
5.72%
6M
1.44%
1Y
-61.69%
3Y*
-66.79%
5Y*
10Y*

DOG

1D
-2.44%
1M
5.84%
YTD
4.40%
6M
1.88%
1Y
-6.66%
3Y*
-5.84%
5Y*
-4.72%
10Y*
-10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NVDS vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NVDS vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDS
NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

DOG
DOG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDS vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDSDOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.01

-0.40

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.60

-0.45

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.94

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.34

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.98

-0.46

-0.52

NVDS vs. DOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDS Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the DOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDS and DOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDSDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.01

-0.40

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.00

-0.55

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between NVDS and DOG is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NVDS vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison

NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.42%, more than DOG's 3.21% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
13.42%14.19%14.11%14.69%5.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
3.21%3.65%5.72%4.54%0.41%0.00%0.14%1.54%0.86%0.04%

Drawdowns

NVDS vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.20%, which is greater than DOG's maximum drawdown of -92.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and DOG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDSDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.20%

-92.59%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.78%

-22.70%

-51.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.03%

-91.95%

-7.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.65%

-66.16%

-16.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.48%

16.48%

+46.00%

Volatility

NVDS vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 5.00%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVDSDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.74%

5.00%

+10.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.94%

9.24%

+29.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.44%

16.82%

+44.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.41%

14.73%

+54.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.41%

17.46%

+51.95%