NVDO vs. MMAX
NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) and MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MMAX.
Performance
NVDO vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDO achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly higher than MMAX's 3.09% return.
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMAX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 3.09% | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDO and MMAX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDO vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank
NVDO
MMAX
NVDO vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDO | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 3.13 | -1.83 |
Drawdowns
NVDO vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDO drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDO and MMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDO | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -1.93% | -14.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -0.13% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -0.10% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility
NVDO vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDO | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.93% | 1.39% | +30.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.93% | 2.49% | +29.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.93% | 2.49% | +29.44% |
NVDO vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDO vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison
NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%, more than MMAX's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 1.27% | 1.31% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDO and MMAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 1.27% for MMAX.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for NVDO and 0.50% for MMAX.
Find the right allocation for NVDO and MMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer