NVDO vs. FBUF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

NVDO vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDO achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 5.95% return.

NVDO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: 16.25%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 5.03%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 1Y: 16.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDO vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	16.35%	10.05%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	5.95%	7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDO and FBUF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

NVDO vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 79
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDO vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDO	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.42	—

Drawdowns

NVDO vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDO drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDO and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDO	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.25%	-11.09%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.73%	-0.53%	-4.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-1.36%	-3.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NVDO	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.20%	8.20%	+23.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.20%	9.64%	+21.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.20%	9.64%	+21.56%

NVDO vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDO vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%, more than FBUF's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.58%	0.64%	0.54%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.32%	16.66%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDO and FBUF in my portfolio?

NVDO and FBUF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NVDO or FBUF?

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDO or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDO or FBUF?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.58% for FBUF.

What is the main difference between NVDO and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for NVDO and 0.48% for FBUF.