NVDL vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NVDL charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

NVDL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 348.80% return.

NVDL

• 1D: 6.85%
• 1M: 22.50%
• 6M: 38.93%
• YTD: 19.13%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 97.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 146.14%

LINT

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -36.81%
• 6M: 190.09%
• YTD: 348.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$20.84M	$19.76M	$34.13M
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	$380.97M	$415.87M	$666.11M

NVDL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	19.13%	3.20%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	348.80%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDL and LINT is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.35

NVDL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVDL	LINT
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

NVDL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDL

NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 18
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 21
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 16

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDL	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.88	—	—

Drawdowns

NVDL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, roughly equal to the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDL	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.55%	-69.02%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.75%	-53.71%	+34.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.47%	-24.41%	+6.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NVDL	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.65%	169.88%	-97.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.01%	169.88%	-79.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.01%	169.88%	-79.87%

NVDL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.61%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDL and LINT in my portfolio?

NVDL and LINT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NVDL or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDL or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDL or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.

What is the main difference between NVDL and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDL and 0.97% for LINT.