PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDG vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDG vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDG achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -20.82% return.


NVDG

1D
-7.35%
1M
14.07%
YTD
18.93%
6M
26.05%
1Y
83.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
-0.14%
1M
13.71%
YTD
-20.82%
6M
-21.35%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDG vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
18.93%32.45%-0.75%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.82%-26.70%-16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDG and TSLG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDG vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDG vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDGTSLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.09

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.13

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

0.28

+4.17

NVDG vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDG and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDGTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.08

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

-0.34

+0.74

Drawdowns

NVDG vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDG drawdown since its inception was -66.19%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDG and TSLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDGTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.19%

-82.86%

+16.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.72%

-54.61%

+11.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.34%

-60.00%

+41.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.07%

-58.73%

+35.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.77%

26.63%

-7.86%

Volatility

NVDG vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) have volatilities of 25.14% and 24.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDGTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.14%

24.41%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.15%

54.58%

-4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.81%

92.53%

-24.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.72%

115.31%

-24.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.72%

115.31%

-24.59%

NVDG vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDG and TSLG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

NVDG vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, more than TSLG's 8.27% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDG and TSLG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDG has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to TSLG (24.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDG dropped -66.19% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 83.14% vs 7.28% for TSLG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLG has been the lower-risk option at 24.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 83.14% return vs 7.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDG and TSLG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 8.27% for TSLG.

NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDG and TSLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer