NVDG vs. HIMZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) and HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDG returned 83.14% vs -93.56% for HIMZ. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for HIMZ.

Performance

NVDG vs. HIMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDG achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than HIMZ's -58.85% return.

NVDG

• 1D: -7.35%
• 1M: 14.07%
• YTD: 18.93%
• 6M: 26.05%
• 1Y: 83.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIMZ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -7.54%
• YTD: -58.85%
• 6M: -69.67%
• 1Y: -93.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDG vs. HIMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF	18.93%	104.59%
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	-58.85%	-65.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDG and HIMZ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

NVDG vs. HIMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDG

NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 34
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

HIMZ

HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDG vs. HIMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDG	HIMZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	-0.49	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	-0.60	+2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.93	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	-0.96	+2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.44	-1.18	+5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDG vs. HIMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the HIMZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDG and HIMZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDG	HIMZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	-0.49	+1.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	-0.40	+0.80

Drawdowns

NVDG vs. HIMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDG drawdown since its inception was -66.19%, smaller than the maximum HIMZ drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDG and HIMZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDG	HIMZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.19%	-98.18%	+31.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.72%	-98.04%	+55.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.34%	-95.53%	+77.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.07%	-68.90%	+45.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.77%	79.15%	-60.38%

Volatility

NVDG vs. HIMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) is 25.14%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a volatility of 53.92%. This indicates that NVDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDG	HIMZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.14%	53.92%	-28.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.15%	131.06%	-80.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.81%	191.74%	-123.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.72%	200.34%	-109.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.72%	200.34%	-109.62%

NVDG vs. HIMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMZ's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDG vs. HIMZ - Dividend Comparison

NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, more than HIMZ's 5.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	5.94%	2.44%
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF	9.93%	11.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDG and HIMZ in my portfolio?

NVDG and HIMZ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDG or HIMZ?

HIMZ has higher volatility (53.92%) compared to NVDG (25.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDG dropped -66.19% vs HIMZ's -98.18%.

Which ETF is better, NVDG or HIMZ?

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 83.14% vs -93.56% for HIMZ. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NVDG has been the lower-risk option at 25.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDG or HIMZ?

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 83.14% return vs -93.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDG or HIMZ?

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDG or HIMZ?

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 5.94% for HIMZ.

What is the main difference between NVDG and HIMZ?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NVDG and 1.31% for HIMZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.