NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L
NVDD.L (IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP) and FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDD.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPG.L.
Performance
NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NVDD.L is traded in GBp, while FEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDD.L achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than FEPG.L's -4.14% return.
NVDD.L
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 36.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- -4.14%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | 2.34% | 22.97% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | -4.17% | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDD.L and FEPG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
NVDD.L
FEPG.L
NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDD.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDD.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -0.09 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDD.L and FEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDD.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -25.89% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.12% | -14.97% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.61% | -11.16% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.06% | — | — |
Volatility
NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDD.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.51% | 19.85% | +9.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.19% | 19.85% | +17.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.19% | 19.85% | +17.34% |
NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FEPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDD.L vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
NVDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.08%, more than FEPG.L's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | 0.27% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | 35.08% | 44.17% | 13.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDD.L and FEPG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDD.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDD.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FEPG.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NVDD.L and 0.65% for FEPG.L.
Find the right allocation for NVDD.L and FEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer