PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. WPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. WPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than WPM's -6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed WPM with an annualized return of 64.62%, while WPM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
2.93%
1M
1.60%
6M
5.16%
YTD
7.77%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
62.93%
5Y*
59.52%
10Y*
64.62%
ALL TIME*
36.28%

WPM

1D
-3.84%
1M
-2.16%
6M
-17.07%
YTD
-6.94%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
36.80%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
15.55%
ALL TIME*
24.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.46B$26.13B$31.85B
$176.53M$177.75M$238.45M

NVDA vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.77%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
-6.94%110.52%15.24%27.91%-7.53%4.22%41.82%54.62%-10.04%16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and WPM is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.12

The correlation between NVDA and WPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$4.86T

WPM:

$49.51B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

WPM:

$3.96

PE Ratio

NVDA:

30.73

WPM:

27.55

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.17

WPM:

0.74

PS Ratio

NVDA:

19.35

WPM:

18.06

PB Ratio

NVDA:

25.05

WPM:

5.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

WPM:

$2.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

WPM:

$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

WPM:

$2.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

WPM
WPM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDA vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDAWPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

0.54

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

1.19

+0.13

NVDA vs. WPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the WPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and WPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than WPM's maximum drawdown of -48.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and WPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAWPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-48.64%

-41.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-37.38%

+17.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-37.38%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-43.29%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-48.64%

-17.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.74%

-34.01%

+19.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-19.03%

-17.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.90%

16.81%

-6.91%

Volatility

NVDA vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) have volatilities of 12.04% and 12.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAWPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

12.22%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.30%

39.66%

-11.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.41%

47.09%

-10.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.87%

35.92%

+15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.95%

36.82%

+13.13%

Dividends

NVDA vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than WPM's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.66%0.56%1.10%1.22%1.54%1.33%1.01%1.21%1.84%1.49%1.09%0.00%

Financials

NVDA vs. WPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. WPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

WPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 689.26M and revenue of 888.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

WPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 666.92M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

WPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 573.98M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and WPM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPM has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs WPM's -48.64%.

WPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and WPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer