PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. TCOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. TCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than TCOM's -34.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed TCOM with an annualized return of 64.62%, while TCOM has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
2.93%
1M
1.60%
6M
5.16%
YTD
7.77%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
62.93%
5Y*
59.52%
10Y*
64.62%
ALL TIME*
36.28%

TCOM

1D
1.14%
1M
14.44%
6M
-23.40%
YTD
-34.63%
1Y
-24.12%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
1.05%
ALL TIME*
16.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.46B$26.13B$31.85B
$161.73M$136.85M$152.49M

NVDA vs. TCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.77%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
-34.63%5.24%90.67%4.68%39.72%-27.01%0.57%23.95%-38.64%10.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and TCOM is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2003

0.31

The correlation between NVDA and TCOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$4.86T

TCOM:

$29.60B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

TCOM:

CN¥45.41

PE Ratio

NVDA:

30.73

TCOM:

6.99

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.17

TCOM:

0.04

PS Ratio

NVDA:

19.35

TCOM:

3.41

PB Ratio

NVDA:

25.05

TCOM:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

TCOM:

CN¥64.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

TCOM:

CN¥51.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

TCOM:

CN¥39.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. TCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TCOM
TCOM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDA vs. TCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDATCOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.90

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

-0.49

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

-0.89

+2.21

NVDA vs. TCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the TCOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and TCOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. TCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than TCOM's maximum drawdown of -76.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and TCOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDATCOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-76.34%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-49.54%

+29.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-49.54%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-49.54%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-71.96%

+5.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.74%

-40.46%

+25.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-27.93%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.90%

27.19%

-17.29%

Volatility

NVDA vs. TCOM - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) at 7.88%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDATCOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

7.88%

+4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.30%

24.85%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.41%

38.45%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.87%

49.11%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.95%

44.47%

+5.48%

Dividends

NVDA vs. TCOM - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while TCOM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
0.00%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVDA vs. TCOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Trip.com Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. TCOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Trip.com Group Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

TCOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 12.80B and revenue of 16.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.5%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

TCOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 3.92B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

TCOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and TCOM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to TCOM (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs TCOM's -76.34%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and TCOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer