NVDA vs. SPGM

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World IMI. Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 68.44%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for SPGM. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NVDA vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than SPGM's 10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 68.44%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.85% annualized return.

NVDA

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 6M: 12.69%
• 1Y: 46.17%
• 3Y*: 75.23%
• 5Y*: 64.35%
• 10Y*: 68.44%

SPGM

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 11.12%
• 1Y: 27.63%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	11.77%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	10.39%	23.62%	16.75%	21.34%	-17.53%	21.13%	15.28%	26.58%	-10.12%	23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and SPGM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012	0.49

The correlation between NVDA and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NVDA vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SPGM

SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 72
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDA	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	2.09	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.83	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.38	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	2.92	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.56	13.03	-7.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDA vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDA	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	2.09	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.25	0.68	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.38	0.73	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.65	-0.03

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and SPGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDA	SPGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.72%	-33.97%	-55.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.21%	-9.50%	-10.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.88%	-16.90%	-19.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.34%	-25.93%	-40.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.34%	-33.97%	-32.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.58%	-3.05%	-8.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.19%	-4.80%	-31.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.33%	2.13%	+6.20%

Volatility

NVDA vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.01% compared to SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) at 4.52%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDA	SPGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.01%	4.52%	+8.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.36%	10.85%	+15.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.74%	13.26%	+21.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.75%	16.09%	+35.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.85%	17.59%	+32.26%

Dividends

NVDA vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SPGM's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	1.83%	1.89%	1.98%	2.09%	2.37%	1.94%	1.45%	2.46%	1.89%	2.29%	1.87%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDA and SPGM in my portfolio?

NVDA and SPGM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDA or SPGM?

NVDA has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to SPGM (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.