PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. RGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. RGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than RGLD's -6.25% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed RGLD with an annualized return of 67.95%, while RGLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
41.70%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%

RGLD

1D
1.47%
1M
-15.27%
YTD
-6.25%
6M
-4.74%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. RGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
-6.25%70.43%10.39%8.70%8.51%0.04%-12.13%44.27%5.53%31.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and RGLD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$5.00T

RGLD:

$17.65B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

RGLD:

$8.53

PE Ratio

NVDA:

31.44

RGLD:

24.34

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.17

RGLD:

1.66

PS Ratio

NVDA:

19.80

RGLD:

11.81

PB Ratio

NVDA:

25.60

RGLD:

2.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

RGLD:

$1.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

RGLD:

$579.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

RGLD:

$949.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. RGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

RGLD
RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. RGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDARGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.11

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.48

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

1.27

+3.67

NVDA vs. RGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the RGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and RGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. RGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, smaller than the maximum RGLD drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and RGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDARGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-98.29%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-35.12%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-35.12%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-40.73%

-25.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-49.55%

-16.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-31.66%

+18.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-29.82%

-6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

13.34%

-4.88%

Volatility

NVDA vs. RGLD - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) at 12.33%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDARGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

12.33%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

32.22%

-5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.00%

39.34%

-4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.76%

31.58%

+20.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.84%

33.66%

+16.18%

Dividends

NVDA vs. RGLD - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than RGLD's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.89%0.81%1.21%1.24%1.24%1.14%1.05%0.87%1.17%1.17%1.45%1.81%

Financials

NVDA vs. RGLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Royal Gold, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
469.13M
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(RGLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. RGLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Royal Gold, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
0
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

RGLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

RGLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.09M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

RGLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a net income of 281.13M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in a net margin of 59.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and RGLD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to RGLD (12.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs RGLD's -98.29%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and RGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer