NVDA vs. GPIQ
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past year, NVDA returned 41.70% vs 33.15% for GPIQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
NVDA vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 15.73% return.
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
GPIQ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 33.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 18.54% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 15.73% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA and GPIQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between NVDA and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA
GPIQ
NVDA vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDA | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.42 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.50 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 14.86 | -9.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDA vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.72% | -21.06% | -68.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -9.51% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -2.35% | -10.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -2.28% | -33.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 2.24% | +6.22% |
Volatility
NVDA vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 6.42%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.26% | 6.42% | +6.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.67% | 11.92% | +14.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.00% | 14.53% | +20.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.76% | 17.72% | +34.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 17.72% | +32.12% |
Dividends
NVDA vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than GPIQ's 9.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.53% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to GPIQ (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDA and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer