PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. DUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than DUK's 8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed DUK with an annualized return of 67.95%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively lower 8.62% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
41.70%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%

DUK

1D
0.91%
1M
2.02%
YTD
8.77%
6M
10.57%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
8.77%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and DUK is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.08

The correlation between NVDA and DUK shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$5.00T

DUK:

$97.35B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

DUK:

$6.61

PE Ratio

NVDA:

31.44

DUK:

18.91

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.17

DUK:

1.48

PS Ratio

NVDA:

19.80

DUK:

2.92

PB Ratio

NVDA:

25.60

DUK:

1.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

DUK:

$33.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

DUK:

$19.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

DUK:

$15.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDADUKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.98

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

2.32

+2.62

NVDA vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and DUK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than DUK's maximum drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and DUK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDADUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-71.92%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-10.88%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-11.59%

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-24.16%

-42.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-37.37%

-28.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-5.28%

-7.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-10.85%

-25.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

4.57%

+3.89%

Volatility

NVDA vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 5.62%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDADUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

5.62%

+7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

11.13%

+15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.00%

14.73%

+20.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.76%

17.84%

+33.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.84%

20.40%

+29.44%

Dividends

NVDA vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than DUK's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.69%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. DUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
9.18B
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(DUK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
67.9%
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and DUK have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to DUK (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs DUK's -71.92%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and DUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer