NVDA vs. CRM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) and CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — NVDA in Semiconductors, CRM in Software - Application. Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 68.47%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for CRM. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NVDA vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 68.47%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.

NVDA

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 47.43%
• 3Y*: 75.35%
• 5Y*: 64.54%
• 10Y*: 68.47%

CRM

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: -30.92%
• 6M: -29.37%
• 1Y: -33.00%
• 3Y*: -4.89%
• 5Y*: -4.74%
• 10Y*: 8.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	12.01%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	-30.92%	-20.25%	27.76%	98.46%	-47.83%	14.20%	36.82%	18.74%	33.98%	49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and CRM is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2004	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between NVDA and CRM has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap NVDA : $5.09T CRM : $159.00B
EPS NVDA : $6.53 CRM : $8.59
PE Ratio NVDA : 31.97 CRM : 21.25
PEG Ratio NVDA : 0.18 CRM : 0.04
PS Ratio NVDA : 20.13 CRM : 3.98
PB Ratio NVDA : 26.03 CRM : 4.64
Total Revenue (TTM) NVDA : $253.49B CRM : $42.83B
Gross Profit (TTM) NVDA : $187.95B CRM : $33.25B
EBITDA (TTM) NVDA : $192.76B CRM : $12.32B

Return for Risk

NVDA vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CRM

CRM Risk / Return Rank: 8
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDA	CRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	-0.88	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	-1.17	+3.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.86	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	-0.84	+3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	-1.62	+7.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDA vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDA	CRM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	-0.88	+2.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.25	-0.13	+1.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.38	0.24	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.45	+0.18

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and CRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDA	CRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.72%	-70.50%	-19.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.21%	-39.36%	+19.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.88%	-54.70%	+17.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.34%	-58.62%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.34%	-58.62%	-7.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.39%	-49.87%	+38.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.20%	-16.12%	-20.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.30%	20.48%	-12.18%

Volatility

NVDA vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.14%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDA	CRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.14%	16.96%	-3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.37%	31.74%	-5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.81%	37.87%	-3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.75%	37.02%	+14.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.85%	35.36%	+14.49%

Dividends

NVDA vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than CRM's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	0.92%	0.63%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDA and CRM in my portfolio?

NVDA and CRM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDA or CRM?

CRM has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to NVDA (13.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs CRM's -70.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.