NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO).

Performance

NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDA.TO Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)	-7.11%	34.82%	167.13%	233.70%	-37.69%
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	-5.51%	291.32%	91.60%	29.57%	48.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA.TO achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly lower than LUG.TO's -5.51% return.

NVDA.TO

• 1D: 5.36%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: -7.11%
• 6M: -7.69%
• 1Y: 57.28%
• 3Y*: 80.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LUG.TO

• 1D: 7.21%
• 1M: -16.21%
• YTD: -5.51%
• 6M: 20.71%
• 1Y: 151.69%
• 3Y*: 96.76%
• 5Y*: 64.31%
• 10Y*: 38.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA.TO

NVDA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
NVDA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
NVDA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NVDA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NVDA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

LUG.TO

LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDA.TO	LUG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.59	-1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.68	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.38	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	6.23	-3.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	17.98	-11.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA.TO and LUG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDA.TO	LUG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	2.59	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	0.00	+1.14

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA.TO and LUG.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison

NVDA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than LUG.TO's 4.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDA.TO Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.03%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.11%
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	4.69%	3.37%	2.69%	3.28%	1.97%

Drawdowns

NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA.TO and LUG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDA.TO	LUG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-95.45%	+34.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.05%	-25.33%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.81%	-16.21%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.69%	-65.23%	+49.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.38%	8.78%	-0.40%

Volatility

NVDA.TO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) is 10.05%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 20.25%. This indicates that NVDA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDA.TO	LUG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	20.25%	-10.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.70%	43.60%	-18.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.74%	59.05%	-19.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.19%	45.61%	+6.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.19%	43.61%	+8.58%

Financials