NVD vs. TSDD
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -46.51% vs -58.78% for TSDD. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
NVD vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -30.49% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's 6.08% return.
NVD
- 1D
- 4.63%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -30.68%
- YTD
- -30.49%
- 1Y
- -46.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 5.40%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -58.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVD vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -30.49% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 6.08% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and TSDD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 0.35 |
NVD vs. TSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVD
TSDD
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
NVD
TSDD
-
Basic Materials
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Communication Services
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Consumer Cyclical
NVD
-
TSDD
Consumer Defensive
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Energy
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Financial Services
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Healthcare
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Industrials
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Real Estate
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Utilities
NVD
-
TSDD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
TSDD
NVD vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVD | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | -0.85 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.07 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVD vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -99.03% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.41% | -69.48% | +9.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.06% | -98.78% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.26% | -72.25% | -10.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.84% | 55.19% | -22.35% |
Volatility
NVD vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is 22.52%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 34.51%. This indicates that NVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.52% | 34.51% | -11.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.51% | 63.03% | -6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.01% | 89.27% | -17.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.19% | 114.41% | -22.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.19% | 114.41% | -22.22% |
NVD vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVD vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.01%, more than TSDD's 7.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 17.01% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.94% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and TSDD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (34.51%) compared to NVD (22.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, NVD leads with -46.51% vs -58.78% for TSDD. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NVD has been the lower-risk option at 22.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVD has performed better with a -46.51% return vs -58.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 17.01%, compared with 7.94% for TSDD.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 0.95% for TSDD.
NVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer