NVD vs. AAPL
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) is Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, NVD returned -61.62% vs 46.63% for AAPL. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
NVD vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -26.99% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 8.46% return.
NVD
- 1D
- 8.30%
- 1M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- -26.99%
- 6M
- -24.81%
- 1Y
- -61.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 46.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.74%
- 10Y*
- 30.05%
NVD vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -26.99% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 8.46% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 9.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and AAPL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
AAPL
NVD vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.38 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 3.40 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 8.35 | -9.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVD vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -81.80% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.44% | -13.80% | -55.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.02% | -6.63% | -92.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.86% | -29.58% | -52.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.02% | 5.60% | +41.42% |
Volatility
NVD vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 26.72% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.98%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.72% | 6.98% | +19.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.57% | 16.62% | +37.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.22% | 22.57% | +48.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.58% | 27.52% | +65.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.58% | 28.92% | +63.66% |
Dividends
NVD vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.20%, more than AAPL's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 16.20% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and AAPL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (26.72%) compared to AAPL (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer