PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVBW vs. XLEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVBW vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVBW achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than XLEI's 21.12% return.


NVBW

1D
0.02%
1M
1.22%
6M
6.50%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
11.16%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.21%

XLEI

1D
-1.73%
1M
7.14%
6M
11.38%
YTD
21.12%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$115.03K$67.54K$110.35K
$1.76M$1.48M$1.32M

NVBW vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVBW and XLEI is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVBW vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVBW
NVBW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBW Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XLEI
XLEI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XLEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XLEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLEI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVBW vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVBWXLEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.85

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.73

11.59

+2.14

NVBW vs. XLEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the XLEI Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBW and XLEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVBW vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBW drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, roughly equal to the maximum XLEI drawdown of -8.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBW and XLEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVBWXLEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-8.19%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-8.19%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.76%

+2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-1.83%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

2.72%

-1.91%

Volatility

NVBW vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) is 1.53%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that NVBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVBWXLEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

4.35%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

11.40%

-6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.26%

14.12%

-8.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.87%

14.11%

-7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.87%

14.11%

-7.24%

NVBW vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVBW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVBW vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison

NVBW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.64%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVBW and XLEI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLEI has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to NVBW (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBW dropped -8.41% vs XLEI's -8.19%.

On 1-year performance, XLEI leads with 31.42% vs 11.16% for NVBW. On fees, XLEI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NVBW has been the lower-risk option at 1.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLEI has performed better with a 31.42% return vs 11.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLEI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for NVBW.

XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 20.64%, compared with 0.00% for NVBW.

NVBW is categorized as Options Trading, while XLEI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NVBW and 0.35% for XLEI.

XLEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVBW and XLEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer