PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVBT vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVBT vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVBT vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NVBT
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF
-2.85%12.84%12.03%16.28%0.24%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%8.19%4.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVBT achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 0.94% return.


NVBT

1D
2.13%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
12.30%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NVBT vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVBT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NVBT vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVBT
NVBT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NVBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVBT vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVBTISWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

1.35

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.86

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.61

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.34

6.68

+0.66

NVBT vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBT and ISWN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVBTISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.35

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

-0.04

+1.11

Correlation

The correlation between NVBT and ISWN is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NVBT vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

NVBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


TTM20252024202320222021
NVBT
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Drawdowns

NVBT vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBT drawdown since its inception was -12.90%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBT and ISWN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVBTISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-32.35%

+19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-9.63%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-7.11%

+2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-16.57%

+15.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.32%

-0.59%

Volatility

NVBT vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) is 3.90%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that NVBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVBTISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

6.13%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

8.60%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

11.81%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.45%

11.47%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

11.40%

-0.95%