PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUW vs. DNYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUW vs. DNYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUW achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than DNYMX's 0.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NUW having a 1.30% annualized return and DNYMX not far ahead at 1.34%.


NUW

1D
0.29%
1M
0.56%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
7.50%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
1.30%

DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.21%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUW vs. DNYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUW
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund
-0.50%9.90%3.51%3.79%-15.19%4.93%4.39%13.99%-9.94%11.94%
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.98%2.69%2.87%2.76%-1.17%-0.10%1.26%2.42%1.02%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NUW and DNYMX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUW vs. DNYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUW
NUW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NUW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUW Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NUW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUW Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUW vs. DNYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUWDNYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

4.18

-2.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

12.55

-11.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

56.41

-51.31

NUW vs. DNYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUW Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the DNYMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUW and DNYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUWDNYMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

4.63

-3.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

1.82

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

1.28

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

1.33

-0.99

Drawdowns

NUW vs. DNYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUW drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, which is greater than DNYMX's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUW and DNYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUWDNYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.43%

-3.19%

-23.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.89%

-0.24%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.19%

-0.98%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-2.53%

-20.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.43%

-3.19%

-23.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

0.00%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-0.42%

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

0.05%

+1.43%

Volatility

NUW vs. DNYMX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW) has a higher volatility of 2.27% compared to DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) at 0.20%. This indicates that NUW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUWDNYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

0.20%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

0.49%

+5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

0.65%

+6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.63%

0.88%

+9.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.16%

1.05%

+11.11%

Dividends

NUW vs. DNYMX - Dividend Comparison

NUW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than DNYMX's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.65%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%0.00%
NUW
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund
4.16%4.07%3.89%3.58%3.44%3.98%2.85%3.87%5.34%5.33%4.72%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUW and DNYMX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUW has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to DNYMX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUW dropped -26.43% vs DNYMX's -3.19%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUW and DNYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer