NUV vs. NMTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX).
NUV is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Apr 8, 1987. NMTRX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
NUV vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUV vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUV Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. | 0.96% | 10.27% | 4.04% | 3.99% | -14.03% | -3.51% | 7.50% | 19.75% | -4.83% | 10.33% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | -0.12% | 3.90% | 1.99% | 6.21% | -11.98% | 2.69% | 5.25% | 9.26% | 1.06% | 7.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUV achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than NMTRX's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, NUV has outperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 2.44%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.
NUV
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 7.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
NMTRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUV vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUV has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NUV vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
NUV
NMTRX
NUV vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUV | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.16 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 0.99 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 2.89 | +3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUV | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.10 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.52 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.97 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUV and NMTRX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NUV vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison
NUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than NMTRX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUV Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. | 4.31% | 4.30% | 4.16% | 3.94% | 3.91% | 3.41% | 3.35% | 3.48% | 4.01% | 3.99% | 4.10% | 3.95% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 4.19% | 4.46% | 3.55% | 3.67% | 3.28% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
NUV vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUV drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, which is greater than NMTRX's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUV and NMTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUV | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.42% | -16.36% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -4.75% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.29% | -16.36% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.29% | -16.36% | -11.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.61% | -2.25% | -6.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -2.93% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 1.62% | -0.41% |
Volatility
NUV vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) at 1.07%. This indicates that NUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUV | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 1.07% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.86% | 1.82% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 4.93% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 3.97% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.35% | 4.38% | +5.97% |