PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUV vs. FCOQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUV vs. FCOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) and Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A (FCOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUV achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly higher than FCOQX's 2.02% return.


NUV

1D
0.33%
1M
2.03%
YTD
3.17%
6M
3.97%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
-0.62%
10Y*
2.27%

FCOQX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.80%
YTD
2.02%
6M
2.39%
1Y
7.52%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUV vs. FCOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NUV
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.
3.17%10.27%4.04%3.99%-14.03%-3.51%7.50%19.75%-0.59%
FCOQX
Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A
2.02%3.34%2.47%5.62%-10.97%1.52%4.72%6.41%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NUV and FCOQX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.31

The correlation between NUV and FCOQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUV vs. FCOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUV
NUV Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FCOQX
FCOQX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FCOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FCOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUV vs. FCOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) and Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A (FCOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUVFCOQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.63

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.86

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

9.79

+1.19

NUV vs. FCOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUV Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the FCOQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUV and FCOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUV vs. FCOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUV drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, which is greater than FCOQX's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUV and FCOQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUVFCOQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.42%

-15.80%

-19.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-2.72%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.24%

-6.79%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.29%

-15.80%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

0.00%

-6.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-4.12%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.79%

+0.21%

Volatility

NUV vs. FCOQX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A (FCOQX) at 0.75%. This indicates that NUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUVFCOQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

0.75%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.21%

2.15%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

3.01%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

4.21%

+5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.33%

4.40%

+5.93%

NUV vs. FCOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUV has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FCOQX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUV vs. FCOQX - Dividend Comparison

NUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than FCOQX's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCOQX
Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A
3.15%3.13%3.01%2.33%2.59%2.09%2.37%2.95%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUV
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.
4.26%4.30%4.16%3.94%3.91%3.41%3.35%3.48%4.01%3.99%4.10%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUV and FCOQX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUV has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to FCOQX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUV dropped -35.42% vs FCOQX's -15.80%.

FCOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUV and FCOQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer