PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUV vs. AGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUV vs. AGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) and abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUV achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than AGD's 13.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NUV has underperformed AGD with an annualized return of 2.43%, while AGD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


NUV

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.60%
1Y
10.54%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
2.43%

AGD

1D
-0.48%
1M
3.19%
YTD
13.13%
6M
14.59%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUV vs. AGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUV
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.
1.79%10.27%4.04%3.99%-14.03%-3.51%7.50%19.75%-4.83%10.33%
AGD
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
13.13%34.31%16.39%7.36%-15.31%23.74%9.49%32.49%-14.98%33.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NUV and AGD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2006

0.14

The correlation between NUV and AGD shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUV vs. AGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUV
NUV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AGD
AGD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUV vs. AGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) and abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUVAGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

1.79

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.75

3.85

+6.91

NUV vs. AGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUV Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the AGD Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUV and AGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUVAGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.56

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.68

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.18

+0.11

Drawdowns

NUV vs. AGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUV drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, smaller than the maximum AGD drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUV and AGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUVAGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.42%

-76.36%

+40.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-20.25%

+16.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.24%

-20.25%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.29%

-28.16%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.29%

-44.12%

+15.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-2.16%

-5.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-29.90%

+20.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

9.42%

-8.44%

Volatility

NUV vs. AGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) is 2.56%, while abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that NUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUVAGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

4.22%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

16.32%

-11.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.99%

23.88%

-16.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.56%

18.98%

-9.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.34%

19.60%

-9.26%

NUV vs. AGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUV has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than AGD's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUV vs. AGD - Dividend Comparison

NUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than AGD's 11.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGD
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
11.07%11.41%10.46%8.35%8.25%6.45%7.47%7.50%9.17%7.22%8.89%8.77%
NUV
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.
4.30%4.30%4.16%3.94%3.91%3.41%3.35%3.48%4.01%3.99%4.10%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUV and AGD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGD has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to NUV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUV dropped -35.42% vs AGD's -76.36%.

AGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUV and AGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer