NUSC vs. VTWG
NUSC (Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF) and VTWG (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - NUSC tracks the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Small Cap while VTWG tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUSC returned 4.65%/yr vs 5.29%/yr for VTWG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NUSC charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VTWG.
Performance
NUSC vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUSC achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly lower than VTWG's 20.43% return.
NUSC
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 13.66%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- —
VTWG
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- 1Y
- 40.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
NUSC vs. VTWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF | 13.66% | 7.72% | 8.29% | 15.72% | -17.73% | 17.51% | 23.69% | 27.09% | -9.40% | 16.50% |
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 20.43% | 13.07% | 15.15% | 18.90% | -26.49% | 2.84% | 34.72% | 28.75% | -9.45% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSC and VTWG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between NUSC and VTWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUSC vs. VTWG — Risk / Return Rank
NUSC
VTWG
NUSC vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUSC | VTWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.71 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 9.72 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUSC vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSC drawdown since its inception was -41.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWG drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSC and VTWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSC | VTWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.49% | -42.07% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -14.88% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.95% | -28.58% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -40.49% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -1.45% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -10.50% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 4.14% | -1.34% |
Volatility
NUSC vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) is 5.19%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that NUSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUSC | VTWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 7.82% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 16.92% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 22.34% | -4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 24.67% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 24.27% | -1.93% |
NUSC vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSC has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUSC vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison
NUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than VTWG's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF | 0.92% | 1.05% | 1.15% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 7.06% | 0.52% | 0.90% | 3.95% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, NUSC and VTWG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWG has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to NUSC (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSC dropped -41.49% vs VTWG's -42.07%.
On 5-year performance, VTWG leads with 5.29% vs 4.65% for NUSC. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, NUSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 5.29% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUSC.
NUSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.59% for VTWG.
NUSC tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Small Cap, while VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUSC and 0.06% for VTWG.
VTWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUSC and VTWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer