PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSA vs. SHAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUSA vs. SHAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with NUSA at 0.48% and SHAG at 0.48%.


NUSA

1D
0.09%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*

SHAG

1D
0.07%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUSA vs. SHAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUSA
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.48%5.89%3.52%5.19%-5.91%-1.04%4.85%5.62%1.40%-0.26%
SHAG
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF
0.48%6.27%4.30%4.61%-6.37%-0.91%4.70%5.79%0.80%-0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between NUSA and SHAG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.72

The correlation between NUSA and SHAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUSA vs. SHAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSA
NUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SHAG
SHAG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SHAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSA vs. SHAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSASHAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.72

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

9.70

+0.19

NUSA vs. SHAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SHAG Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSA and SHAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSASHAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.05

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.59

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.84

-0.02

Drawdowns

NUSA vs. SHAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSA drawdown since its inception was -9.44%, roughly equal to the maximum SHAG drawdown of -9.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSA and SHAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSASHAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-9.62%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-1.38%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.62%

-1.38%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.44%

-9.62%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.54%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-1.87%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.39%

-0.03%

Volatility

NUSA vs. SHAG - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) at 0.60%. This indicates that NUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUSASHAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

0.60%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.33%

1.31%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82%

1.84%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

2.75%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.72%

2.58%

+0.14%

NUSA vs. SHAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SHAG's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NUSA vs. SHAG - Dividend Comparison

NUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than SHAG's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUSA
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.86%3.83%3.93%3.54%2.44%2.16%2.51%2.85%3.22%2.20%
SHAG
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF
4.28%4.33%4.49%3.04%1.38%0.92%2.33%2.71%2.56%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUSA and SHAG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUSA has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to SHAG (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSA dropped -9.44% vs SHAG's -9.62%.

On 5-year performance, SHAG leads with 1.61% vs 1.53% for NUSA. On fees, SHAG is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHAG has performed better with a 1.61% return vs 1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHAG is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for NUSA.

SHAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.86% for NUSA.

NUSA tracks ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond (1-5 Y), while SHAG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Short Aggregate Enhanced Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for NUSA and 0.12% for SHAG.

SHAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUSA and SHAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer