PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSA vs. NUDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUSA vs. NUDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUSA vs. NUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NUSA
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.18%5.89%3.52%5.19%-5.91%-0.75%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
3.94%10.77%14.02%10.13%-7.83%8.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUSA achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than NUDV's 3.94% return.


NUSA

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
0.18%
6M
1.07%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*

NUDV

1D
0.20%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
3.94%
6M
7.48%
1Y
13.48%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUSA vs. NUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NUDV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NUSA vs. NUDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSA
NUSA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSA vs. NUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSANUDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

0.89

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

1.33

+1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.19

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

1.12

+1.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.54

4.97

+6.56

NUSA vs. NUDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the NUDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSA and NUDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSANUDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

0.89

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.57

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between NUSA and NUDV is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NUSA vs. NUDV - Dividend Comparison

NUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than NUDV's 2.40% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUSA
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.82%3.83%3.93%3.54%2.44%2.16%2.51%2.85%3.22%2.20%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.40%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NUSA vs. NUDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSA drawdown since its inception was -9.44%, smaller than the maximum NUDV drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSA and NUDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSANUDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-20.10%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-11.81%

+10.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-4.85%

+4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-5.05%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

2.65%

-2.32%

Volatility

NUSA vs. NUDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) is 0.80%, while Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that NUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUSANUDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

3.58%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.19%

7.63%

-6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95%

15.14%

-13.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.78%

15.12%

-12.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.74%

15.12%

-12.38%