PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSA vs. DDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUSA vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUSA achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.21% return.


NUSA

1D
0.09%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*

DDV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUSA vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUSA and DDV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUSA vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSA
NUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DDV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSA vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSADDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

NUSA vs. DDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSADDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

2.04

-1.22

Drawdowns

NUSA vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSA drawdown since its inception was -9.44%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSA and DDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSADDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-1.92%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.14%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-0.35%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

Volatility

NUSA vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUSADDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82%

2.67%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

2.67%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.72%

2.67%

+0.05%

NUSA vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NUSA vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

NUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.21%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUSA
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.86%3.83%3.93%3.54%2.44%2.16%2.51%2.85%3.22%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUSA and DDV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NUSA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NUSA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.

NUSA has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

NUSA is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for NUSA and 0.25% for DDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUSA and DDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer