NUSA vs. DDV
NUSA (Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUSA is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond (1-5 Y), while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. NUSA is passively managed, while DDV is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUSA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
NUSA vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUSA achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.21% return.
NUSA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUSA vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NUSA Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.48% | 0.62% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.21% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSA and DDV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUSA vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
NUSA
DDV
NUSA vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUSA | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUSA | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 2.04 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
NUSA vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSA drawdown since its inception was -9.44%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSA and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSA | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -1.92% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.14% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -0.35% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
NUSA vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUSA | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82% | 2.67% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.80% | 2.67% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.72% | 2.67% | +0.05% |
NUSA vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NUSA vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
NUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUSA Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.86% | 3.83% | 3.93% | 3.54% | 2.44% | 2.16% | 2.51% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUSA and DDV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUSA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUSA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.
NUSA has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
NUSA is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for NUSA and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for NUSA and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer