PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMI vs. DRLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMI vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMI achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 36.69% return.


NUMI

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.57%
6M
-0.55%
YTD
0.27%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.66%

DRLL

1D
0.80%
1M
14.19%
6M
21.14%
YTD
36.69%
1Y
44.82%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$463.62K$500.96K$563.89K
$143.18K$168.88K$126.57K

NUMI vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
0.27%3.78%
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
36.69%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMI and DRLL is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMI vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUMI
NUMI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUMI vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUMIDRLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.46

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

6.27

+0.47

NUMI vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the DRLL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMI and DRLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUMI vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMI drawdown since its inception was -4.72%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMI and DRLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMIDRLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-23.73%

+19.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-16.99%

+14.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-4.30%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-8.14%

+6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

6.68%

-5.78%

Volatility

NUMI vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) is 0.85%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that NUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMIDRLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

6.71%

-5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

18.75%

-16.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31%

23.03%

-19.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.23%

23.80%

-19.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.23%

23.80%

-19.57%

NUMI vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMI vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

NUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than DRLL's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.22%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
3.32%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMI and DRLL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRLL has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to NUMI (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMI dropped -4.72% vs DRLL's -23.73%.

On 1-year performance, DRLL leads with 44.82% vs 5.27% for NUMI. On fees, NUMI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NUMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 44.82% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.

NUMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.22% for DRLL.

NUMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NUMI and 0.41% for DRLL.

NUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMI and DRLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer