PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMG vs. PDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMG vs. PDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than PDP's 24.95% return.


NUMG

1D
-1.63%
1M
5.76%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.31%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*

PDP

1D
0.57%
1M
6.22%
YTD
24.95%
6M
24.18%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMG vs. PDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-0.40%0.78%11.99%20.47%-28.31%12.27%45.73%34.87%-5.79%19.00%
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
24.95%8.37%26.06%20.88%-24.49%7.72%36.59%33.13%-5.96%23.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMG and PDP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.84

The correlation between NUMG and PDP shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUMG vs. PDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUMG
PDP

Technology

28.7%
26.9%

Industrials

26.5%
39.2%

Healthcare

13.9%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
5.5%

Financial Services

6.5%
4.4%

Communication Services

5.2%
2.2%

Real Estate

3.7%
1.3%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.3%

Utilities

1.4%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.8%

Energy

-

6.3%

Technology

NUMG
28.7%
PDP
26.9%

Industrials

NUMG
26.5%
PDP
39.2%

Healthcare

NUMG
13.9%
PDP
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

NUMG
11.8%
PDP
5.5%

Financial Services

NUMG
6.5%
PDP
4.4%

Communication Services

NUMG
5.2%
PDP
2.2%

Real Estate

NUMG
3.7%
PDP
1.3%

Basic Materials

NUMG
2.3%
PDP
2.3%

Utilities

NUMG
1.4%
PDP
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

NUMG

-

PDP
3.8%

Energy

NUMG

-

PDP
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMG vs. PDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PDP
PDP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMG vs. PDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMGPDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.30

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

3.15

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

11.16

-11.22

NUMG vs. PDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the PDP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMG and PDP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMGPDPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

1.70

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.52

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.45

-0.01

Drawdowns

NUMG vs. PDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, smaller than the maximum PDP drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and PDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMGPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-59.34%

+20.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.71%

-11.87%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

-23.79%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

-33.91%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

0.00%

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-10.61%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

3.34%

+4.25%

Volatility

NUMG vs. PDP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) is 4.75%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that NUMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMGPDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

6.51%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

17.34%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

21.94%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

22.00%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

21.59%

+0.28%

NUMG vs. PDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PDP's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMG vs. PDP - Dividend Comparison

NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than PDP's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%0.00%0.00%
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.15%0.42%0.45%0.00%0.11%0.25%0.18%0.28%0.81%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMG and PDP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to NUMG (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMG dropped -38.85% vs PDP's -59.34%.

On 5-year performance, PDP leads with 11.32% vs 0.99% for NUMG. On fees, NUMG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NUMG has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PDP has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

PDP has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NUMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PDP is Momentum. NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth, while PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUMG and 0.62% for PDP.

PDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMG and PDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer