PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMG vs. NUMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMG vs. NUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than NUMI's 1.53% return.


NUMG

1D
-1.63%
1M
5.76%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.31%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*

NUMI

1D
0.06%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.91%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMG vs. NUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-0.40%-4.04%
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
1.53%3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMG and NUMI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMG vs. NUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMI
NUMI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMG vs. NUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMGNUMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.48

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.76

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

8.62

-8.68

NUMG vs. NUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the NUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMG and NUMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMGNUMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

2.24

-2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.91

-0.47

Drawdowns

NUMG vs. NUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than NUMI's maximum drawdown of -4.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and NUMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMGNUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-4.72%

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.71%

-2.82%

-16.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

-0.63%

-8.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-1.39%

-9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

0.90%

+6.69%

Volatility

NUMG vs. NUMI - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) at 1.05%. This indicates that NUMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMGNUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

1.05%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

2.23%

+12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

3.48%

+14.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

4.39%

+18.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

4.39%

+17.48%

NUMG vs. NUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMG vs. NUMI - Dividend Comparison

NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NUMI's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
3.66%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMG and NUMI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMG has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to NUMI (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMG dropped -38.85% vs NUMI's -4.72%.

On 1-year performance, NUMI leads with 7.75% vs -0.49% for NUMG. On fees, NUMI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NUMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUMI has performed better with a 7.75% return vs -0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.

NUMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NUMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while NUMI is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUMG and 0.29% for NUMI.

NUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMG and NUMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer